Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, and this makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as podsmall.com a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.